Methodology
How PropDetect estimates rent
Rent drives yield, cash flow, mortgage serviceability and every hold strategy, and it is also the figure a local landlord can check fastest, because they know what their patch lets for. So the rent method is built for someone who knows the area to interrogate, and its central rule is that the comparable has to match the property.
This page explains where the rent comes from, why the report shows two rent figures rather than one, and how the confidence score is earned rather than asserted.
Matched comparables, not area averages
The estimate is built from lettings comparables near the property, matched on bedroom count and property type. A two-bed flat is benchmarked against two-bed flats, not against the three-bed terraces nearby that happen to be listed, and not against an area-wide average that blends studio flats with family houses.
That sounds obvious, and it is the discipline most rent tools quietly skip. An area average is easy to compute and looks authoritative, but a landlord comparing it against their street sees the mismatch instantly, and a figure that fails that check poisons trust in everything else on the report. Every comparable behind our figure is visible: rent, size, type, distance, and whether it was let agreed or asking.
Two rents, because there are two questions
The report shows market rent and post-refurbishment rent side by side, because they answer different questions. Market rent is the median of the matched comparables: what the property would realistically let for today, in its current condition band. The post-refurbishment estimate sits above it, reflecting a renovated, well-presented property letting at the stronger end of the same evidence, and the premium between the two is stated as a percentage.
Showing one number without the other is how rent estimates mislead. A post-refurb figure presented alone reads as optimism to anyone checking asking rents; a market figure alone understates a genuinely renovated product. Both, with the gap explicit, lets you judge the assumption rather than swallow it.
Let agreed beats asking
Where the comparable set includes let agreed listings, properties that actually found a tenant at the advertised rent, they are weighted as stronger evidence than listings still waiting. An asking rent is a landlord's hope; a let agreed rent is a tenant's signature. The report tells you how many of the comparables behind the figure were let agreed.
Confidence you can interrogate
The rent confidence score is computed from the evidence: how many genuinely matched comparables existed, how tightly they agreed, how far away they were, and how many were let agreed rather than asking. Few or scattered comparables produce a low score, and the report explains the driver in a sentence, "only three genuinely comparable lets were available, so the range is wide", rather than presenting a bare percentage.
When the local evidence is too thin for a bedroom-matched estimate, the system widens its basis and says so, and a weak estimate announces itself on the report without you having to expand anything.
Where the rent feeds next
The rent flows into gross and net yield, monthly cash flow, mortgage serviceability, the BRRR refinance case, and social housing and serviced accommodation modes where those strategies apply. Because everything downstream recalculates when you edit, a landlord who knows their achievable rent can put it in and watch the whole deal re-derive in seconds.
The limits, stated plainly
- Lettings comparables are drawn from the advertised market: asking rents, strengthened by let agreed listings where available. In patches where landlords routinely let below asking, portal-derived evidence sits slightly high, and no tool built on market data can fully see that gap. If you know your patch lets below asking, edit the rent and everything recalculates.
- The post-refurbishment premium assumes the refurbishment described in the report actually happens, to a good standard. It is an assumption, it is labelled, and it is capped by the comparable evidence rather than open-ended.
- Rent for genuinely unusual stock, the only five-bed in a postcode of two-beds, carries wide honest ranges because the evidence to narrow them does not exist.
- No measured rent accuracy figure is published yet. The matching method shipped recently, and a fair test needs it to have run for a period first.
Frequently asked questions
Where does the PropDetect rent estimate come from?
From lettings comparables near the property matched on bedroom count and property type, with let agreed listings weighted as stronger evidence than asking rents. Every comparable behind the figure is visible on the report.
Why does the report show two rent figures?
Market rent is the median of the matched comparables, what the property lets for today. The post-refurbishment estimate reflects a renovated property letting at the stronger end of the same evidence, and the premium between the two is stated so you can judge the assumption rather than swallow it.
How is the rent confidence score calculated?
From the evidence: comparable count, agreement between comparables, distance, and the share that were let agreed. Thin or scattered evidence produces a low score with the reason stated in a sentence.
What if I know the real rent for my patch?
Edit it. Every figure recalculates downstream, and user corrections feed the calibration loop, so knowing your patch better than the portal data makes the product better too.
Last reviewed 4 September 2026. Claims on this page trace to our internal evidence register.